Implementation of Extraordinary Review (Pk) For the Public Prosecutors after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 33/Puu-Xiv/2016

The background of this paper is inspired and triggered to observe study the legal uncertainty between public prosecutor convict/his heirs regarding authority submit a PK Application as regulated in Article 263 paragraph (1) Criminal Procedure Code. article states "the right prosecutor" apply for application. However, what expected by Petitioner's wife that Code can be interpreted way, "PK applications only filed convicted person or their heirs". This condition was exacerbated issuance Constitutional Court decision Number 33/PUU-XIV/ 2016 file application criminal case". aims determine extraordinary remedies implications implementing these remedies. research method used normative research. results showed after 33/PUU-XIV/2016, had direct Petitioner his family. implication detrimental Petitioners' constitutional rights based on 28G 1945 Constitution because protection personal, family, honor dignity has clearly been lost. It better if reaffirms principles through interpretation which an integral part not separate from question able provide fair certainty.